Choose what you allow. You can change this at any time, and declining does not limit your use of the site. Privacy policy
Most app projects stall after they are built, stuck in store red tape: developer account, D-U-N-S, verification, Apple rejection. Here that is part of the delivery. And if the conversation makes it clear that a website is a better fit for your case, we will tell you.
It is the question that saves the most money anywhere on this site, so it comes before the commercial part.
An app asks the person to download it, grant permissions, give up space on their device, and come back. That is a big ask. It only pays off when there is something a website cannot do.
If your case is in the right-hand column, we say so in the first conversation and point you toward the website route. Selling an app to someone who needed a website is the most expensive way to disappoint them.
There is honestly no such thing as a price list for apps. What can be explained is what pushes the cost in each direction.
The moment there is sign-up, there is password recovery, sessions, permissions, and personal data to protect. It is the first major cost boundary.
Storing data on the device and syncing later sounds like a detail and is one of the most expensive items: it means resolving conflicts between what changed on the phone and on the server at the same time.
Digital content sold inside the app goes through the store's own billing, with its commission. A physical product or in-person service goes through a regular gateway. These are different technical paths.
Talking to the ERP, the CRM, or the company's internal system. When there is a documented API it is straightforward; when there is not, this is the longest part of the project.
A single codebase produces both versions and greatly reduces the cost compared with two separate builds. Very system-specific features may need dedicated work, but that is the exception.
Android and iOS change the rules every year. An app left untouched breaks on its own over time: it disappears from search, loses compatibility, and can be removed from the store. Ask any vendor about this before you sign.
What the app needs to do to be worth it in the first version. Almost every project arrives with twice the scope it needs; cutting here is what ensures it actually ships.
You see the screen designs before they become code, and adjust while changing them is still cheap.
Installable builds on your own phone along the way, so you can really use it instead of approving from screenshots.
Opened in your company's name, with D-U-N-S and verification handled by us. We start this early, in parallel, because it is the stage that delays launches the most.
Store listing, privacy declarations, submission, and follow-up on the review. A rejection fixed and resubmitted is part of the scope.
New versions based on real usage and on changes to store rules. Launch is the start of the app's life, not the end of the project.
On ownership, to leave no doubt: the account belongs to your company, the source code is delivered, and store payouts go into its account. Nothing stays locked to us.
Tell us briefly where the operation gets stuck. We will send back a diagnosis with what to automate first and the ballpark investment.
